Fine Tracker.

A public register of regulatory fines issued under EU compliance directives. Updated as decisions are published by national supervisory authorities.

5,273 entries

Total fines
€8.6bn
Decisions
5,273
Jurisdictions
33
Regulators
74
Avg monthly
€162.7m
YoY volume
-21.4%
Country
Type
Date range
ImposedCompanyCountryAuthorityTypeAmount
28 Oct 2021OTTO s.r.l.OTTO s.r.l. was fined by the Italian data protection authority, Garante, in the amount of 2,000 EUR. The case concerned a video surveillance system operated without the required privacy notice, which constitutes a breach of Article 13 GDPR.ITGaranteGDPR€2,000
13 May 2015Ottodue s.r.l.Ottodue s.r.l. was fined EUR 12,000 by the Garante for retaining surveillance footage for 98 days. This exceeded the 7-day retention limit set out in the video surveillance guidelines.ITGaranteGDPR€12,000
25 Nov 2022OTP LEASING ROMANIA IFN SAOTP LEASING ROMANIA IFN SA was fined by ANSPDCP for breaching data security provisions. The penalty followed a data breach notification indicating that personal data had not been adequately protected.ROANSPDCPGDPR€3,000
03 Nov 2023OTP BANK ROMANIA SAThe National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing imposed a fine of EUR 3,000 on OTP BANK ROMANIA SA for GDPR violations. The case concerned non-compliance with personal data protection requirements.ROANSPDCPGDPR€3,000
08 Jan 2015OTEThe Hellenic Data Protection Authority fined OTE EUR 60,000 for failing to implement adequate security measures. The deficiency led to a data breach involving personal data of a large number of subscribers.GRHDPAePrivacy€60,000
07 Oct 2019OTEOTE was fined by the HDPA EUR 200,000 for failing to process unsubscribe requests from marketing emails due to a technical error. The issue affected about 8,000 subscribers and had been ongoing since 2013.GRHDPAGDPR€200,000
09 Oct 2018OTEThe Hellenic Data Protection Authority imposed a fine of EUR 150,000 on OTE. The case concerned unsolicited promotional calls made to subscribers who had previously opted out of such contact.GRHDPAePrivacy€150,000
21 Feb 2025Österreichische Post AGThe Austrian Federal Administrative Court upheld a major GDPR fine against Österreichische Post AG for unlawful processing of political affinity data and other personal data used in direct marketing. The court reduced the penalty from EUR 18 million to EUR 16 million, while confirming the underlying data protection breaches.ATÖsterreichische DatenschutzbehördeGDPR€16,000,000
22 Feb 2024Ossitocina24 di Patrono AntonellaOssitocina24 di Patrono Antonella was fined 5,000 EUR by the Italian Garante. The case concerned the failure to delete personal data from its website after a contract termination request, which breached GDPR data processing requirements.ITGaranteGDPR€5,000
24 Jun 2021Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino GesùOspedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù was fined by the Garante 15,000 EUR for breaches involving a data incident and improper handling of patient health data. The authority cited violations of GDPR Articles 5 and 32 on lawful processing and security of personal data.ITGaranteGDPR€15,000
01 Sept 2025Osnovna škola XThe school unlawfully forwarded personal data of 18 employees to the City of Y, breaching GDPR Articles 5 and 6. AZOP imposed a fine of EUR 2,000.HRAZOPGDPR€2,000
01 Sept 2025Osnovna škola XAZOP imposed a fine of EUR 2,000 on Osnovna škola X for breaching GDPR rules on personal data processing. The case involved unlawful processing of personal data, indicating a compliance failure under data protection requirements.HRAZOPGDPR€2,000
14 Jun 2018Osimo Servizi s.p.a.Osimo Servizi s.p.a. was fined EUR 8,000 by the Garante. The breach concerned the failure to notify the processing of biometric data used in an employee attendance system.ITGaranteGDPR€8,000
22 Nov 2023ORTHOPHONISTE (procédure simplifiée)CNIL imposed a EUR 5,000 fine on ORTHOPHONISTE under a simplified procedure and issued an injunction. The case concerns a breach of the data protection authority’s requirements.FRCNILGDPR€5,000
11 Oct 2024ORTHOPHONISTE (procédure simplifiée)The CNIL imposed a 4,000 EUR penalty on ORTHOPHONISTE (procédure simplifiée) in connection with the liquidation of an astreinte. The case concerns compliance with a prior obligation under the data protection authority’s supervision.FRCNILGDPR€4,000
10 Jun 2021orthodontiepraktijkThe entity failed to implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to secure personal data, which constitutes a breach of Article 32 GDPR. Sensitive data on the website was not transmitted over encrypted connections, increasing the risk of disclosure.NLAPGDPR€12,000
30 Jan 2014Orovicenza di Picaro CristinaOrovicenza di Picaro Cristina was fined EUR 4,800 by the Garante. The authority found that the website’s contact and registration forms did not provide the required data protection information, in breach of the Italian data protection code.ITGaranteGDPR€4,800
06 Aug 2025ORNITOLÓGICA DE ANDALUCÍA FOAORNITOLÓGICA DE ANDALUCÍA FOA was fined EUR 1,500 by the AEPD for sending a mass email that contained personal data, including names and DNI numbers, without adequate security measures. The authority found this to be a breach of data protection rules.ESAEPDGDPR€1,500
16 Apr 2022ORI, S.l.ORI, S.l. was fined by the AEPD 2,000 EUR for failing to provide a privacy policy on its website. Personal data was collected through multiple forms, which constituted a breach of data protection rules.ESAEPDGDPR€2,000
18 Dec 2018ORGANIZACION NACIONAL DE CIEGOS (ONCE)ONCE was fined EUR 40,000 by the AEPD for sending more than 200 unsolicited commercial emails without prior consent. The authority found this to be a breach of Article 21 of the LSSI governing electronic marketing communications.ESAEPDePrivacy€40,000