Fine Tracker.

A public register of regulatory fines issued under EU compliance directives. Updated as decisions are published by national supervisory authorities.

5,273 entries

Total fines
€8.6bn
Decisions
5,273
Jurisdictions
33
Regulators
74
Avg monthly
€162.7m
YoY volume
-21.4%
Country
Type
Date range
ImposedCompanyCountryAuthorityTypeAmount
05 Oct 2016RASTREATOR.COM LIMITED SUCURSAL EN ESPAÑARASTREATOR.COM LIMITED SUCURSAL EN ESPAÑA was fined by the AEPD €1,000 for sending unsolicited commercial emails. The authority found that the emails were sent despite the recipient’s request to opt out, which breached Article 21.1 of the LSSI.ESAEPDePrivacy€1,000
06 Oct 2016Comune di FurnariThe Municipality of Furnari was fined 4,000 EUR by the Garante. The authority found that personal data remained published on the institutional website beyond the legally permitted period.ITGaranteGDPR€4,000
06 Oct 2016Infantino Auto S.r.l.ITGaranteGDPR€2,400
06 Oct 2016ESPACIO DOCENTE, S.L.ESPACIO DOCENTE, S.L. was fined EUR 1,000 by the AEPD for sending unsolicited commercial emails without prior consent. The company also failed to stop communications after being asked to do so, breaching Article 21.1 of the LSSI.ESAEPDePrivacy€1,000
06 Oct 2016Comune di FurnariComune di Furnari was fined for publishing personal data on its institutional website. It also failed to respond to information requests from the Garante.ITGaranteGDPR€4,000
10 Oct 2016ROCK INTERNET S.L.ROCK INTERNET S.L. was fined 3,800 EUR by the AEPD. The case concerned sending unsolicited commercial emails without recipient consent, in breach of Article 21.1 of the LSSI.ESAEPDePrivacy€3,800
12 Oct 2016AG Preziosi Banco Metalli s.r.l.AG Preziosi Banco Metalli s.r.l. was fined by the Garante for collecting personal data through a website contact form without providing the required privacy notice. This constituted a breach of Article 13 of the Italian Privacy Code.ITGaranteGDPR€2,400
12 Oct 2016Lorenzo RiccitelliLorenzo Riccitelli was fined 16,000 EUR by the Italian data protection authority, Garante. The case concerned unsolicited emails and SMS messages used for electoral propaganda without the required information or consent from recipients.ITGaranteGDPR€16,000
12 Oct 2016Condominio via Michelangelo da CaravaggioThe condominium was fined €4,800 by the Garante. The authority found that the surveillance system notices did not identify the data controller, which breached data protection rules.ITGaranteGDPR€4,800
25 Oct 2016CEPSA COMERCIAL PETROLEO, SAUCEPSA COMERCIAL PETROLEO, SAU was fined by the AEPD in the amount of 5,700 EUR. The sanction concerned the sending of unauthorized commercial emails in breach of Article 21.1 of the LSSI.ESAEPDePrivacy€5,700
25 Oct 2016CENTROS COMERCIALES CARREFOUR, S.A.CENTROS COMERCIALES CARREFOUR, S.A. was fined EUR 7,000 by the AEPD for sending unsolicited commercial emails. The authority also found that the company failed to provide a proper opt-out mechanism, breaching Article 21 of the LSSI.ESAEPDePrivacy€7,000
27 Oct 2016Studio Medico Odontoiatrico Associato Gimmelli B. & G.Studio Medico Odontoiatrico Associato Gimmelli B. & G. was fined by the Garante for unlawfully processing personal data by disclosing it to Ina Assitalia s.p.a. without obtaining the required informed consent from the data subject. The case reflects a breach of core lawful-processing requirements.ITGaranteGDPR€6,400
27 Oct 2016Porto di Imperia s.p.a.Porto di Imperia s.p.a. was fined by the Italian Garante in the amount of €2,400. The authority found a data protection breach linked to the use of a video surveillance system because individuals entering the port were not provided with simplified information.ITGaranteGDPR€2,400
27 Oct 2016Confezioni Hu LingzhiConfezioni Hu Lingzhi was fined EUR 2,400 by the Garante. The authority found that the company failed to provide data subjects with information about the processing of personal data through a video surveillance system.ITGaranteGDPR€2,400
27 Oct 2016Coledan EmanuelaColedan Emanuela was fined EUR 2,400 by the Garante for failing to inform data subjects about the processing of personal data through a video surveillance system at a private club. The case concerns a breach of transparency and information obligations toward individuals under surveillance.ITGaranteGDPR€2,400
10 Nov 2016Marketing & Comunicazione s.r.l.Marketing & Comunicazione s.r.l. was fined for making an unauthorized advertising phone call. The company also failed to respond to information requests from the Garante.ITGaranteGDPR€4,000
10 Nov 2016Marketing & Comunicazione s.r.l.Marketing & Comunicazione s.r.l. was fined by the Garante for making an unsolicited promotional call to a number listed in the public opposition registry. The conduct breached data protection rules.ITGaranteGDPR€10,000
10 Nov 2016Comune di Sant'AgnelloComune di Sant'Agnello was fined EUR 4,000 by the Garante. The authority found that personal data of children had been published on the municipality's website, in breach of privacy rules.ITGaranteGDPR€4,000
10 Nov 2016Funworld s.r.l.Funworld s.r.l. was fined €2,400 by the Garante for failing to respond to a request for information concerning the unlawful processing of personal data through a video surveillance system. The case concerned a failure to cooperate with the supervisory authority.ITGaranteGDPR€2,400
24 Nov 2016Minerv@ s.r.l.Minerv@ s.r.l. was fined by the Garante 10,000 EUR for sending promotional emails to a complainant after they objected and requested deletion of their data. The authority found that the company’s conduct breached data protection rules.ITGaranteGDPR€10,000