Fine Tracker.

A public register of regulatory fines issued under EU compliance directives. Updated as decisions are published by national supervisory authorities.

5,273 entries

Total fines
€8.6bn
Decisions
5,273
Jurisdictions
33
Regulators
74
Avg monthly
€162.7m
YoY volume
-20.7%
Country
Type
Date range
ImposedCompanyCountryAuthorityTypeAmount
21 Mar 2022B.B.B.The AEPD imposed a 300 EUR fine on B.B.B. for improperly directing a camera toward a transit area. The case concerned non-compliance with data protection rules governing video surveillance.ESAEPDGDPR€300
14 Jun 2023B.B.B.The entity was fined EUR 300 by the AEPD for installing a camera on the exterior facade of a building, aimed at public space, without the required administrative authorization. The authority treated this as a breach of data protection rules.ESAEPDGDPR€300
04 Apr 2023B.B.B.A neighbor installed a digital peephole with video recording capabilities without the consent of the homeowners' association. AEPD found that personal data were processed without a lawful basis, in breach of Article 6(1) GDPR.ESAEPDGDPR€300
27 Sept 2018Anonymisiert (DSB DSB-D550.084/0002-DSB/2018)The authority imposed a EUR 300 fine for operating dash-cams in a vehicle without proper signage. It found breaches of GDPR principles of lawfulness, fairness, transparency, and data minimization.ATDSBGDPR€300
16 Mar 2023B.B.B.B.B.B. was fined by the AEPD in the amount of EUR 300 for failing to provide adequate information about video surveillance. The authority found a breach of Article 13 GDPR because the affected individuals did not receive the required information.ESAEPDGDPR€300
20 Feb 2023B.B.B.B.B.B. installed a surveillance camera aimed at a private property without authorization. The AEPD found this to be a breach of Article 5(1)(c) GDPR.ESAEPDGDPR€300
30 Jun 2022B.B.B.The entity was fined EUR 300 by the AEPD for failing to display the required signage informing individuals about video surveillance at its premises. The authority treated this as a breach of the information obligations under Article 13 GDPR.ESAEPDGDPR€300
01 Jan 2024FRUTAS CALISA, S.L.FRUTAS CALISA, S.L. was fined 300 EUR by the AEPD for contacting an individual via WhatsApp without prior consent. The authority found this conduct to be a breach of Article 6(1) GDPR.ESAEPDGDPR€300
08 Jun 2022INMUR JOYEROS, S.L.INMUR JOYEROS, S.L. was fined by the AEPD 300 EUR for failing to properly inform individuals about the video surveillance system in its premises. The authority found a breach of Article 13 GDPR.ESAEPDGDPR€300
26 May 2023B.B.B.The entity was fined EUR 300 by the AEPD for operating a video surveillance system that captured public areas without proper informational signage. The authority treated this as a breach of data protection rules.ESAEPDGDPR€300
29 Nov 2022B.B.B.The entity was fined by the AEPD EUR 300 for installing surveillance cameras that recorded images and sound in public and communal areas without the required authorization. This constituted a breach of data protection rules.ESAEPDGDPR€300
01 Sept 2022B.B.B.The entity was fined for installing surveillance cameras that captured public areas without prior administrative authorization. This constituted a breach of data protection regulations.ESAEPDGDPR€300
20 Jun 2022PLANET COSTA DORADA SOCIEDAD LIMITADAThe company was fined by the AEPD EUR 300 for operating video surveillance that captured public space without proper signage. The authority found a breach of GDPR Articles 5 and 13.ESAEPDGDPR€300
12 Jul 2023B.B.B.The entity installed a surveillance camera without authorization and captured images of communal areas. This breached Article 6(1) GDPR.ESAEPDGDPR€300
20 Nov 2024B.B.B.B.B.B. was fined by the AEPD EUR 300 for sending a marketing email to multiple recipients without using BCC. This exposed recipients’ email addresses to each other and breached data protection principles.ESAEPDGDPR€300
16 Sept 2022SUPER 24H LOS ROSALES, S.L.The company was fined EUR 300 by the AEPD for operating an external surveillance camera without visible signage. It also failed to provide information on the data controller and data subject rights required under GDPR.ESAEPDGDPR€300
29 Jul 2022COMUNIDAD DE PROPIETARIOSA community of property owners was fined by the AEPD €300 for installing a surveillance camera without proper signage. The notice did not identify the data controller or provide contact details for exercising data subject rights.ESAEPDGDPR€300
05 Apr 2022B.B.B.B.B.B. was fined 300 EUR for installing a surveillance camera that recorded public areas and private property. The authority found this to be a breach of data protection rules.ESAEPDGDPR€300
10 Jul 2023B.B.B.The AEPD imposed a 300 EUR fine on B.B.B. after a surveillance camera was directed toward the complainant's property. The authority found a breach of data protection rules due to unauthorized processing of image data.ESAEPDGDPR€300
26 May 2023B.B.B.B.B.B. was fined EUR 300 by the AEPD for installing a video surveillance system that captured public areas and a private path without authorization. The authority found a breach of the data minimization principle under GDPR Article 5(1)(c).ESAEPDGDPR€300