BULLETIN №084Last updated · 12 Aug 2026
Fine Tracker.
A public register of regulatory fines issued under EU compliance directives. Updated as decisions are published by national supervisory authorities.
5,273 entries
- Total fines
- €8.6bn
- Decisions
- 5,273
- Jurisdictions
- 33
- Regulators
- 74
- Avg monthly
- €162.5m
- YoY volume
- -23.7%
| Imposed | Company | Country | Authority | Type | Amount | ↗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 Dec 2025 | Anonimizirano (IP-RS 0609-128/2025/6)A legal entity was fined by IP-RS for failing to implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to secure personal data processing. This failure led to unauthorized access to data stored on a company laptop. | SI | IP-RS | GDPR | €1,000 | ↗ |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Anonimizirano (IP-RS 0609-104/2025/18)The entity was fined EUR 6,000 for systematically and indiscriminately collecting employees’ location data through GPS devices in company vehicles without a legal basis. The authority found a breach of the lawfulness principle under Article 5 GDPR. | SI | IP-RS | GDPR | €6,000 | ↗ |
| 21 Nov 2025 | Anonimizirano (IP-RS 0609-114/2025/9)A legal entity was fined by IP-RS for failing to implement adequate organizational and technical measures to secure personal data processing on a publicly accessible web server. This led to unauthorized access to the personal data of 12 individuals. | SI | IP-RS | GDPR | €16,250 | ↗ |
| 13 Aug 2025 | Anonimizirano (IP-RS 0609-97/2024/2)A sole proprietor was fined for failing to respond to a request from the Information Commissioner within the specified 10-day period. The authority treated this as a breach of Article 31 GDPR. | SI | IP-RS | GDPR | €500 | ↗ |
| 22 Jul 2025 | Anonimizirano (IP-RS 0609-101/2024/5)A legal entity was fined by IP-RS for a GDPR breach involving the unauthorized disclosure of personal data, including hospital treatment details, via email. The case concerned processing that failed to meet confidentiality and access-control requirements. | SI | IP-RS | GDPR | €2,000 | ↗ |
| 08 Dec 2025 | Anonimizirano (IP-RS 0609-112/2025/7)A legal entity was fined 4,800 EUR by IP-RS for failing to provide concise, transparent, and understandable information to individuals when collecting personal data through online forms. The authority found this to be a breach of Article 13 GDPR. | SI | IP-RS | GDPR | €4,800 | ↗ |
| 01 Oct 2023 | TrustpilotThe Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) fined Trustpilot EUR 4,000,000. The authority found that the company misled consumers about the authenticity of reviews and how they were moderated. | IT | Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) | Omnibus | €4,000,000 | ↗ |
| 18 Mar 2025 | JRSY Laser LimitedThe Jersey Data Protection Authority fined JRSY Laser Limited 500 GBP following an investigation opened on 27 March 2024. The case concerned a breach of data protection requirements by the data controller. | JE | JOIC | GDPR | €594 | ↗ |
| 25 Mar 2025 | Star Delta Electrical ServicesThe Jersey Data Protection Authority fined Jon Peacock t/a Star-Delta Electrical Services £4,000. The case arose from a client complaint concerning the handling of personal data by the sole trader. The penalty was issued under the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2018. | JE | JOIC | GDPR | €4,787 | ↗ |
| 01 Jan 2026 | Telekommunikationsunternehmen aus NRWThe Landesbeauftragte für Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit Nordrhein-Westfalen imposed a total fine of EUR 300,000 on a telecommunications company from North Rhine-Westphalia. The authority found breaches of transparency obligations and data subject rights, including requests for access, deletion, and objection. | DE | Landesbeauftragte für Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit Nordrhein-Westfalen | GDPR | €300,000 | ↗ |
| 12 Sept 2025 | A Düsseldorf-based personnel recruitment companyOn 2025-09-12, the LDI NRW announced a data protection fine of over 35,000 EUR against a Düsseldorf-based personnel recruitment company. The authority said the company repeatedly ignored job seekers’ requests for access and deletion and failed to respond to the supervisory authority’s inquiries. | DE | Landesbeauftragte für Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit Nordrhein-Westfalen | GDPR | €35,000 | ↗ |
| 30 Jun 2020 | AOK Baden-WürttembergThe Baden-Württemberg data protection authority fined AOK Baden-Württemberg EUR 1.24 million on 2020-06-30. It found that personal data from more than 500 contest participants was processed for advertising purposes without valid consent, and that the technical and organizational measures required under Article 32 GDPR were insufficient. | DE | Landesbeauftragter für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit Baden-Württemberg | GDPR | €1,240,000 | ↗ |
| 18 Aug 2023 | Személyes adatok kezelése online közszolgáltatás nyújtása soránThe supervisory authority found that the controller did not provide adequate information about the data retention period. It also unlawfully refused access to the requested call recordings, breaching GDPR Articles 12, 13, and 15. | HU | NAIH | GDPR | €13,050 | ↗ |
| 20 Jul 2023 | Hozzáférési jog terjedelmeThe decision found that the bank breached GDPR by failing to provide access to camera footage and recordings and by not implementing security measures when sending data. A fine of HUF 2,000,000 was imposed. | HU | NAIH | GDPR | €5,280 | ↗ |
| 08 Jun 2020 | Volt munkavállaló munkavégzési célú elektronikus leveleihez való hozzáféréseThe controller unlawfully denied access to the complainant's archived personal emails from 2018. It also failed to provide transparent information about the actions taken in response to the data subject's request. | HU | NAIH | GDPR | €582 | ↗ |
| 22 Mar 2021 | Tájékoztatási kötelezettség elmulasztása, hozzáférési jog és adatkezelés korlátozásához való jogThe controller did not inform the data subject within the required timeframe about actions taken on their requests. It also delayed access to the requested footage and failed to block the camera recording, resulting in a data protection fine. | HU | NAIH | GDPR | €1,365 | ↗ |
| 19 Apr 2021 | BankThe Bank was fined by NAIH for breaching the principles of purpose limitation and data minimization when transferring personal data without a proper legal basis. The authority also found failures to respect the data subject's rights of access and objection. | HU | NAIH | GDPR | €13,900 | ↗ |
| 25 Mar 2021 | Kamerák üzemeltetése idősek otthonábanThe authority imposed a fine for using video surveillance for unlawful purposes. It also found that the data subjects were not adequately informed and that there was no proper legal basis for processing. | HU | NAIH | GDPR | €1,370 | ↗ |
| 08 Aug 2022 | Hangfelvétel készítése szerelési munkák soránThe authority found that the entity breached the GDPR by recording audio during installation work without a proper legal basis. It also failed to meet transparency and data protection principle requirements. | HU | NAIH | GDPR | €762 | ↗ |
| 10 Dec 2020 | Ítélet a NAIH/2020/54/H. sz. ügyben (Fővárosi Törvényszék 105.K.707.432/2020/17.)The entity was fined for processing scholarship applicants' personal data without a legal basis, including sensitive data. The authority also found that the data subjects were not adequately informed about the processing. | HU | NAIH | GDPR | €22,480 | ↗ |