BULLETIN №081Last updated · 26 Jul 2026
Fine Tracker.
A public register of regulatory fines issued under EU compliance directives. Updated as decisions are published by national supervisory authorities.
5,273 entries
- Total fines
- €8.6bn
- Decisions
- 5,273
- Jurisdictions
- 33
- Regulators
- 74
- Avg monthly
- €162.7m
- YoY volume
- -20.7%
| Imposed | Company | Country | Authority | Type | Amount | ↗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Jul 2022 | LA CASA DEL BAMBÚLA CASA DEL BAMBÚ was fined €200 by the AEPD for continuing to send marketing emails to a customer after an unsubscribe request. The authority found this to be a breach of Article 21 of the LSSI on unsolicited commercial communications. | ES | AEPD | ePrivacy | €200 | ↗ |
| 16 Aug 2022 | Fiziska personaA fine of EUR 200 was imposed. The decision has entered into force. | LV | DVI | GDPR | €200 | ↗ |
| 03 Nov 2025 | Fiziskas personaA fine of EUR 250 was imposed by DVI. The decision has entered into force. | LV | DVI | GDPR | €250 | ↗ |
| 18 Jan 2024 | Fiziska personaA fine of EUR 250 was imposed by the DVI. The decision is final and has entered into force. | LV | DVI | GDPR | €250 | ↗ |
| 06 Jul 2006 | PR3 International s.r.l.PR3 International s.r.l. was fined by the Italian data protection authority, Garante, in the amount of EUR 258. The case concerned inadequate information provided to data subjects in job advertisements, which breached data protection rules. | IT | Garante | GDPR | €258 | ↗ |
| 06 Jul 2006 | I.C. Recruiting di Aldo Corradi & C. s.n.c.The company was fined EUR 258 by the Garante for failing to provide adequate information to data subjects in job advertisements. This constituted a breach of Article 13 of the Italian Codice Privacy. | IT | Garante | GDPR | €258 | ↗ |
| 12 Jul 2006 | Diomede s.r.l.Diomede s.r.l. was fined EUR 258 by the Garante for failing to provide adequate information to data subjects in job advertisements. This constituted a breach of the Italian Privacy Code. | IT | Garante | GDPR | €258 | ↗ |
| 06 Jul 2006 | Pricewaterhouse Cooper Executive Search & SelectionPricewaterhouse Cooper Executive Search & Selection was fined 258 EUR by the Italian Garante. The case concerned inadequate information provided to candidates about the processing of their personal data in job advertisements, in breach of Art. 13 of the Codice Privacy. | IT | Garante | GDPR | €258 | ↗ |
| 06 Jul 2006 | Selework s.a.s.Selework s.a.s. was fined EUR 258 by the Garante for failing to provide candidates with adequate information about the processing of their personal data in job advertisements. The authority found a breach of Article 13 of the Codice Privacy. | IT | Garante | GDPR | €258 | ↗ |
| 23 Mar 2023 | B.B.B.B.B.B. was fined 300 EUR by the AEPD for installing surveillance cameras that could capture images of a neighboring property without prior authorization. The authority found this to be a breach of the data minimization principle under Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. | ES | AEPD | GDPR | €300 | ↗ |
| 25 Feb 2022 | B.B.B.B.B.B. was fined by the AEPD in the amount of EUR 300 for installing a surveillance camera that captured a public transit area. The footage was then disseminated without consent, which constituted a breach of data protection rules. | ES | AEPD | GDPR | €300 | ↗ |
| 09 Mar 2023 | B.B.B.A camera was installed in a community garage without prior authorization and without proper signage. The AEPD found this to be a breach of Article 13 GDPR and imposed a EUR 300 fine. | ES | AEPD | GDPR | €300 | ↗ |
| 18 Apr 2023 | B.B.B.A neighbor installed a surveillance camera aimed at the public street without authorization. The authority found this breached the data minimization principle under GDPR Article 5(1)(c). | ES | AEPD | GDPR | €300 | ↗ |
| 18 Nov 2022 | Asociația de Proprietari Bld. Pipera 1-2EThe association was fined for failing to provide requested information within the legal deadline. The case concerns a breach of the duty to cooperate with the supervisory authority. | RO | ANSPDCP | GDPR | €300 | ↗ |
| 27 Feb 2023 | B.B.B.B.B.B. was fined by the AEPD in the amount of EUR 300 for installing surveillance cameras that could capture images of a neighbor's property without authorization. The authority found this to be a breach of the data minimization principle under Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. | ES | AEPD | GDPR | €300 | ↗ |
| 19 May 2023 | B.B.B.The entity was fined by the AEPD for installing a video surveillance system that captured public areas without authorization. The footage was then used for dissemination via WhatsApp, which breached Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. | ES | AEPD | GDPR | €300 | ↗ |
| 16 Sept 2022 | B.B.B.B.B.B. was fined EUR 300 by the AEPD for installing a surveillance camera. The authority found that the device may have recorded images of a neighboring property without consent, potentially breaching data protection rules. | ES | AEPD | GDPR | €300 | ↗ |
| 04 Mar 2024 | EXESRIVAS GESTIÓN PATRIMONIALThe entity sent unsolicited commercial messages via WhatsApp despite the complainant's explicit refusal to receive such communications. AEPD found a breach of Article 21 of the LSSI and imposed a 300 EUR fine. | ES | AEPD | ePrivacy | €300 | ↗ |
| 24 Mar 2023 | A.A.A.A.A.A. was fined EUR 300 by the AEPD for failing to provide adequate information about data processing in a video surveillance system. The authority found a breach of Article 13 GDPR because data subjects did not receive the required information. | ES | AEPD | GDPR | €300 | ↗ |
| 26 Sept 2022 | B.B.B.B.B.B. was fined EUR 300 by the AEPD for failing to provide adequate information about a video surveillance system. The camera captured a public area without proper notice to affected individuals, breaching Article 13 GDPR. | ES | AEPD | GDPR | €300 | ↗ |