Fine Tracker.

A public register of regulatory fines issued under EU compliance directives. Updated as decisions are published by national supervisory authorities.

5,273 entries

Total fines
€8.6bn
Decisions
5,273
Jurisdictions
33
Regulators
74
Avg monthly
€162.7m
YoY volume
-21.7%
Country
Type
Date range
ImposedCompanyCountryAuthorityTypeAmount
18 Jun 2021Magyar Telekom Nyrt.The Hungarian data protection authority fined Magyar Telekom Nyrt. for unlawful processing of personal data. The case involved failure to delete an email address and improper handling of data subject rights.HUNAIHGDPR€28,100
16 Jun 2021Vejle KommuneVejle Kommune was fined by Datatilsynet for failing to implement appropriate security measures, which led to the unintended disclosure of personal data, including children's addresses. The authority also found no assessment of whether such disclosures were necessary.DKDatatilsynetGDPR€13,447
16 Jun 2021MARBELLA RESORTS, S.L.MARBELLA RESORTS, S.L. was fined EUR 7,000 by the AEPD for non-compliance with data protection rules. The breaches concerned the handling of personal data and the website cookie policy.ESAEPDePrivacy€7,000
15 Jun 2021VODAFONE ESPAÑA, S.A.U.VODAFONE ESPAÑA, S.A.U. was fined 50,000 EUR by the AEPD for continuing to pursue a debt that had already been settled. The authority treated this as a breach of data protection rules.ESAEPDGDPR€50,000
15 Jun 2021Huppuís ehf.Huppuís ehf. was fined 5,000,000 ISK by Persónuvernd for unlawful electronic surveillance in an ice cream shop. The authority found breaches of transparency and proportionality requirements and noted that employees, including minors, were not informed about the surveillance.ISPersónuverndGDPR€33,950
14 Jun 2021SIA "Andy corporation"A monetary fine of EUR 491.18 was imposed on SIA "Andy corporation" by the DVI. The decision is final and has entered into force.LVDVIGDPR€491
14 Jun 2021B.B.B.The entity was fined by the AEPD EUR 3,000 for publicly disseminating surveillance footage without justification. The conduct breached data protection principles.ESAEPDGDPR€3,000
12 Jun 2021MERCEDES GERENCIA, S.L.MERCEDES GERENCIA, S.L. was fined by the AEPD in the amount of 3,000 EUR for breaching Article 58.1 of the GDPR. The case concerned non-compliance with obligations related to the supervisory authority’s powers.ESAEPDGDPR€3,000
11 Jun 2021BRAbank ASABRAbank ASA was fined NOK 400,000 by Datatilsynet for failing to perform risk assessments and testing before launching a customer portal. The deficiency led to a data breach in which customers could view other customers’ loan information.NODatatilsynetGDPR€39,672
11 Jun 2021Anonymisé (CNPD decision-21-fr-2021)The company did not comply with the data minimization principle and failed to adequately inform employees and third parties about data processing activities. CNPD found these practices to breach GDPR Articles 5(1)(c) and 13.LUCNPDGDPR€7,600
11 Jun 2021Anonymisé (CNPD decision-20-fr-2021)The company was fined EUR 15,000 by the CNPD for failing to properly involve the Data Protection Officer in matters related to personal data protection. The authority also found that the DPO's autonomy was not ensured and that the advisory and monitoring functions were not adequately supported.LUCNPDGDPR€15,000
11 Jun 2021Anonymisé (CNPD decision-22-fr-2021)The company failed to comply with GDPR requirements on data minimization and transparency. It also did not adequately inform individuals about video surveillance and geolocation systems, breaching Articles 5(1)(c), 5(1)(e), 13, and 32(1) of the GDPR.LUCNPDGDPR€7,200
10 Jun 2021MARIA & DESPOINA KOUSATHANA O.E.The company was fined by the HDPA 5,000 EUR for operating a video surveillance system without proper notification and for unlawful camera use in kitchen areas. The authority also found that data subjects were not informed about the processing of their personal data.GRHDPAGDPR€5,000
10 Jun 2021dott. MariniThe Garante imposed a EUR 20,000 fine on dott. Marini for unlawfully collecting information about patients' HIV status. The authority found a breach of the principles of necessity and proportionality in personal data processing.ITGaranteGDPR€20,000
10 Jun 2021orthodontiepraktijkThe entity failed to implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to secure personal data, which constitutes a breach of Article 32 GDPR. Sensitive data on the website was not transmitted over encrypted connections, increasing the risk of disclosure.NLAPGDPR€12,000
10 Jun 2021Ministero dell’InternoThe Italian Data Protection Authority fined Ministero dell’Interno EUR 75,000 for posting videos on social media that breached data protection rules. The footage related to a criminal case was shared by the police and contained violent content, which was found inconsistent with data protection principles.ITGaranteGDPR€75,000
10 Jun 2021aiComply S.r.l.aiComply S.r.l. was fined by the Garante in the amount of EUR 20,000 for failing to implement adequate security measures. In particular, it did not use a secure network protocol, which created a risk to the confidentiality and integrity of personal data.ITGaranteGDPR€20,000
10 Jun 2021Foodinho s.r.l.Foodinho s.r.l. was fined by the Garante EUR 2,600,000 for violations in the processing of riders’ personal data. The authority cited insufficient data minimization, inadequate privacy by design measures, and automated decision-making without proper human intervention.ITGaranteGDPR€2,600,000
10 Jun 2021Aeroporto Guglielmo Marconi di Bologna S.p.a.Aeroporto Guglielmo Marconi di Bologna S.p.a. was fined by the Garante EUR 40,000 for violations related to the protection of whistleblower identities. The case indicates insufficient personal data safeguards in the handling of reports.ITGaranteGDPR€40,000
09 Jun 2021Räddningstjänsten Östra SkaraborgIMY found that Räddningstjänsten Östra Skaraborg breached the GDPR by improperly using surveillance cameras in changing areas. The authority also identified excessive personal data processing and inadequate security measures.SEIMYGDPR€34,794